Why do employees resist change summary

Exact match. More search options. Choosing Online search and preview What's new? Discover What is the case method? Preparing to teach Choosing a case Teaching notes Featured cases Using cases with undergraduates Online case teaching.

Submitting a case Why submit to us? Discover the case method What is learning with cases? Accessing cases What's available to students? Case training What do we offer? Resources Knowledge centre Discover the case method Feature articles Connect newsletter Recognition and rewards Discussion group.

Organisation and people History and governance Mission and activities Meet the team Visiting us Contact us. Membership The benefits Membership for developing countries Become a member organisation Current members. News room News Information for the press Connect newsletter Brand guidelines. Product details. By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them. You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Why Do Employees Resist Change? You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. Persuasive Presentation vs. Personal Compacts However, Strebel believes that this fundamental difference in viewpoint can be reconciled through observing with personal compacts. Formal The first dimension of the personal compact is the formal dimension, the one that we are most familiar with. Psychological The second dimension of a personal compact is the psychological dimension, which is less explicitly stated and relayed compared to the formal dimension.

Social The third and final dimension of a personal compact is the social aspect. Phillips In the s, Philips struggled to keep up with the competition, as they struggled to get their products onto the market in a timely manner, as manufacturing costs started increasing, and as they saw their market share in areas like Northern Europe steadily decrease. Critical Review In my opinion, it would be difficult to apply the concepts discussed in the article to the public sector, as adjusting these personal compacts often involves drastic actions that would be difficult to accomplish in a unionized workplace.

Share this: Twitter Facebook. Like this: Like Loading Manipulation Next. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:. Email required Address never made public. Name required. Create your website with WordPress. Follow Following. Creatures of habit Doing things in the same routine, predictable manner is comfortable. Asking people to change the way they operate or think is asking them to move outside their comfort zone.

No obvious need Some employees may see a change only from the perspective of the impact it has on them and their particular jobs. Not seeing the big picture, they may fail to recognize the positive impact of the change on the organization as a whole. Thus, they may find the change disruptive and totally unnecessary.

Loss of control Familiar routines help employees develop a sense of control over their work environment. Being asked to change the way they operate may make employees feel powerless and confused. Concern about support system Employees operating within predictable routines know their support system will back them up during challenging times. Changing the organizational structures may shake their confidence in their support system. They may worry about working for a new supervisor, with new employees or on unfamiliar projects because they fear that if they try and fail, there will be no one there to support them.

Unwillingness to learn Some employees, hesitant to try new routines, express an unwillingness to learn anything new. They also hinder their own personal growth and development. Fear that the new way may not be better If things have been going well, some employees may resist change because they fear that the change will not result in improvement. Focusing only on their part of the operation, they fail to realize that change is needed in order for the organization to stay competitive.

They may resist forward movement because they are satisfied with the way things are going. Their current status is quite sufficient, and they wish to maintain business as usual.

Fear of the unknown Employees may resist change simply because it is something unfamiliar. Based on data from our employee opinion surveys, only Not knowing much about the specifics of the change, they may imagine a worst case scenario, which can be very scary. They let fear of the unknown become their rationale for not giving the change a chance. These employees may acknowledge that a problem exists and agree that a change might improve it.

However, they worry that the proposed change might actually make things worse! Their fear causes them to place roadblocks in the movement toward change. Fear of personal impact Viewing change from a personal standpoint, some employees may respond by asking how the change will benefit them directly. Will it make their job easier? Will they have to work harder? Will the change put their job security in jeopardy?

Will the change force them to work with different people or learn a new job? Share Post. Next 6 Steps to Building Your Vision. Related posts More details.